That's such a shame. You probably had more readers on your site than the book had. Perhaps that's the problem? Bad publicity for S&S.But you are not alone with your analysis Richard, there are many others who have read the book and also feel that S&S failed miserably in many areas, especially as they are supposed to be investigative journalists. Least of which is their lack of references and links to the information they supposedly sourced (as outlined here):http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/Book.htm
the book was just another blue print of the scammers lies - no one sane could read the PJ files and come to any othe conclusion than GUILTY of so much more than neglect
Big shame, but hardly surprising. Big powers at work here :(
Could you be more explicit as to who has threatened you? And are you ok? best rgds. Jo
The blog/ book review was factual. I can not see the problem.I am sorry you were intimidated :-(
So sorry that you have been "got at". Is it possible that you could post the DNA stuff again somewhere else? Or send it to Joana? I am very interested to read it again but neglected to make a copy ...Best wishes x
I hope to read the DNA articles again too. Very informative and easy for me to understand, although I can't remember the details now unfortunately. Perhaps, as you say Lesly, Richard could pass them onto Joana or perhaps Pamalam for others to read too.
This is a joke and I fear for everyone's liberty.
After the earthquake, which had destroyed three-fourths of the city of Lisbon, the sages of that country could think of no means more effectual to preserve the kingdom from utter ruin than to entertain the people with an auto-da-fe, it having been decided by the University of Coimbra, that the burning of a few people alive by a slow fire, and with great ceremony, is an infallible preventive of earthquakes.In consequence thereof they had seized on a Biscayan for marrying his godmother, and on two Portuguese for taking out the bacon of a larded pullet they were eating; after dinner they came and secured Dr. Pangloss, and his pupil Candide, the one for speaking his mind, and the other for seeming to approve what he had said...Voltaire, Candide (chapter 6)
Oh dear Philip - well at least there is now confirmation that `someone` doesn`t want the details of the S&S book queried. I wonder why. Quite a few people have saved your work so it will, no doubt, appear again soon. It`s getting reminiscent of the Thought Police !
OMG r these men in space suits Dont the nasty ones usually come in the dark of might like the mystery abductor ?
Thank you for clarification, hope you keep on blogging under a pseudonym. best rgds. Jo.
well the scammers use multiple aliases /identities so why cant you ? sounds great to me